2015 HSC Section 1 Book of Articles

TABLE 1. ( Continued ).

TABLE I. Studies Meeting Criteria for Systematic Review.

Author

Year

No. of Patients

Author

Year

No. of Patients

Schick 86 Scholtz 5 Sinha 87

1999 2001 2008 2006 2006 1997 2007 2008 2007 2002 2009 2011 2006 2011 2008 2004 2010 2010 2009 2011 2005 2001 2009 2009 2011 2009 2001 2005 1996 2002 2011 1999 1996 2003 2011 1998

5

Individual patient data Ahmad 41

14

2008 2009 2002 2011 2011 2006 2000 1994 2003 2006 2004 2011 2007 1997 2008 1997 2010 1994 1992 1997 2001 2004 2002 2005 1996 2001 2008 2008 2003 1998 2000 1999 2003 1999 2003 2006 2002 2002 2005 1997 2002 2011 2002 2003 2010 2005 2010 2008 1998

5 1 1 2 1 1 5 2 9 5

2 1

Albuquerque 42 Antoniades 43

Szymanska 88

Tosun 21 Tseng 89

24

Avelar 44

1 2

Aziz Sultan 45

Yi 90

Borghei 46 Browne 47 Browne 48 de Brito 50 Donald 51 Dubey 52 Dare 49

23

Yiotakis 40

19

Total individual patient data

345

Aggregate patient data Andrade 91

12

Bales 92 Bleier 93

5

18 42

16

Bosraty 94

Eloy 53

6

Chen 33

8

Fagan 54

16 15

Cherekaev 95

29 85 19 23 16 31 37 39 19 20 42 33 58 23 20 12 14 36 4 7

Fonseca 55 Gaffney 56

Danesi 96

1 1 1

de Mello-Filho 97

Gallia 57 Goel 58

Elsharkawy 98

Gaillard 99

Gullane 20 Gupta 8 Handa 59 Hardillo 23 Hazarika 60 Hofmann 61

14

Hackman 18 Herman 34 Hosseini 100 Howard 36 Huang 101 Margalit 25 Mattei 102 Midilli 103

7 1

28

9

25

Kamel 62 Khalifa 63 Koshy 64

1 1 1 6 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 1 1 1 4 1 3

Paris 6

Lin 22

Pryor 19

Mair 65

Radkowski 9

Moschos 66

Roger 35 Singh 104 Tewfik 105

Murray 67

Nakamura 68

Naraghi 69

12 12 15

Ungkanont 106 Wormald 107

Newlands 70 Nicolai 71 Nomura 72 Patrocinio 74 Patrocinio 75 Peloquin 76 Ochi 73

7

Ye 26

23 20

Zhang 108

Total aggregate patient data

702

this cohort ( P < .05). There was significantly lower recurrence in the purely endoscopic group compared to endoscopic-assisted ( P < .05) and open surgical approaches ( P < 0.05) (Table IV). There was no signifi- cant difference between recurrence rates of endoscopic- assisted and open surgical cases ( P > .05). DISCUSSION JNA is a rare entity, making prospective, random- ized, double-blind analysis difficult. Therefore, systematic review of the existing literature can provide valuable information when these optimal studies are not feasible. We conducted a systemic review with the

Powell 77 Ramos 78 Reddy 79

Rha 80

Riggs 81

Robinson 82 Romani 83

Rong 84 Schick 85

1 (Continues)

Laryngoscope 123: April 2013

Boghani et al.: Systematic Review of JNA

115