2017 Sec 1 Green Book
Reprinted by permission of Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 79(5):690-693.
International
Journal
of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 79
(2015)
690–693
Contents
lists
available
at ScienceDirect
International
Journal
of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
jour nal
homepage:
www.elsevier .com/locat e/ijpo r l
Quantitative
evaluation
of
facial
growth
in
children
after
unilateral
drainage §
ESS
for
subperiosteal
orbital
abscess
Sagi a ,
Eviatar a ,
Paul Gottlieb b , Haim Gavriel a , *
Lihi
Ephraim
a Department b Department
Israel 1
of Otolaryngology Head
and Neck
Surgery,
Assaf Harofeh Medical
Center,
Zerifin Israel 1
70300,
of Diagnostic
Imaging,
Assaf Harofeh Medical
Center,
Zerifin
7030070300,
A
R
T
I
C
L
E
I
N
F
O
A
B
S
T
R
A
C
T
Article
history:
To determine
the effects of unilateral endoscopic
sinus
surgery
(ESS) on
facial
skeletal growth
Objective:
Received Received Accepted Available
7
January revised
2015
children.
in
in
form
16
February
2015
Retrospective
controlled
study.
Design: Setting:
17
February
2015
Academic
tertiary
referral medical
center.
online
24
February
2015
Included were
children who
underwent
a
unilateral
ESS
procedure later went
between through
and methods:
Materials
and 2006
to
evacuate
a subperiosteal orbital
abscess
(SPOA) and
several years
1995
Keywords: Endoscopic
their
facial development between
the surgical and nonsurgical
cephalometric measurements comparing
sinus
surgery
sides. Results: time of
orbital
abscess
Subperiosteal
A total of 6 children were
recruited
for
this study
(3 girls and 3 boys), between
the ages 3
to 10 at
face
Mid
surgery, and
from 9.5
to 23 years of age
today. Four of difference was
the
children had
surgery on
the
right
side
Change Children
2
on
the
left.
No
statistically
significant
found when
evaluating
all
planes
in
the
and
radiographs
according
to
age
at
surgery,
age
today
and
years
from
surgery.
cephalometric
In our
study, no
significant differences were
found
in craniofacial growth between
the the
sides face,
Conclusion:
the
face
in
children who
underwent
ESS
for
the
same medical
indication
on
one
side
of
of
that
ESS might
be
safely
performed
even
in
young
children.
suggesting
–2c
of
evidence:
Level
2015
Elsevier
Ireland
Ltd.
All
rights
reserved.
1. Introduction
including patient age, procedure performed and
the various pathologies
treated, imaging
the
surgical
the need
for
further
for accurate
reports
and
animal
studies
have
raised
concerns
of
the
facial
skeleton
post-surgery.
For
example, Kosko
evaluation
Insufficient
debate
regarding
the
impact
of
surgical
intervention
of
the [1–
al.
reported
maxillary
sinus
hypoplasia
on
CT
scan
after facial
and
et
facial development
in
the pediatric population
sinus
surgery
(ESS), but with no apparent
clinical
nasal sinuses on
endoscopic asymmetry
Most
of
these
studies
were
conducted
on
piglets,
showing
[11] .
In
addition
to
this,
very
aggressive
surgical interrup- In another
8] .
facial growth on
the side of
the endoscopic surgery.
lesions was not associated with
interruption of
management of mid-face
the
animals
did
not
show
any
clinical
evidence
of
facial growth as was suggested by Lund et al.
[12] .
However, abnormal
tion of study
growth human
[9,10] . beings
The
effects
of
sinus
surgery
on
facial
conducted
by
Wolf
et
al.,
no
evidence
of
facial
growth
in
has
been
even
less
frequently
reported evaluated
latter studies did not
growth
interruptionwas reported; however, these two
to
the
significant
quantity
of
parameters
to
be
accurate measurements
of
the
facial
skeleton.
due
perform
purpose
of
this
study
is
to
evaluate
the
effect
of
extensive
The
removal
of
the
ethmoid
cells
and
the
lamina papyracea
unilateral
in a unique group of children having a
by ESS on mid-facial growth subperiosteal orbital abscess
§ There
is
no
direct
or
indirect
commercial
financial
incentive
associated with
(SPOA), and compare
this
to
the non-
the article;
there
is no extra-institutional
funding; financial
there are no possible
publishing
side
using
antero-posterior
(AP)
cephalometric
radio-
operated
conflicts
of
interest;
there
are
no for
sources
of
support,
corporate
(soft
tissue
and
bone
intensity).
graphs
patent
holdings,
etc.
our
research/study;
and
there
is
no
ethical
involvement,
problem.
* Corresponding
author.
Tel.:
+972
8
9779417;
fax:
+972
8
9779421.
and methods
2. Materials
haim.ga@012.net.il
(H. Gavriel).
address:
1 Affiliated
to
the
Sackler
Faculty
of Medicine,
Tel
Aviv University,
Ramat
Aviv,
study was
approved
by
the
IRB.
The
Israel.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.02.016 0165-5876/ 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All
rights
reserved.
92
Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker