FLEX October 2023
Risk and interval to malignancy of patients with laryngeal dysplasia 367
Potentially relevant papers identified by search n=1037 n =1037
Studies excluded by abstract review n=989 n =989
Papers retrieved for evaluation n=48 n =48
Studies excluded after evaluation (n=39) Not larynx (n=3) Not dysplasia (n=8) Cross sectional studies (n=4) Lack of outcome data (n=6) Minimum follow up not recorded (n=6) Minimum follow up <6 months (n=4) Anomalous MTR, with high risk of bias (n=1) Included patients with early transformation (n=1) Duplication of data (n=4) Review article (n=2) ( n =39) Not larynx ( n =3) Not dysplasia ( n =8) Cross sectional studies ( n =4) Lack of outcome data ( n =6) Minimum follow up not recorded ( n =6) Minimum follow up <6 months ( n =4) ( n =1) transformation ( n =1) Duplication of data ( n =4) Review article ( n =2)
Studies included in meta-analysis n=9 n =9
Fig. 1. Flow diagram showing search strategy and study selection.
Table 2. Description of studies, ordered by minimum follow-up
Mean or median age (years)
Total dysplasia patients
Mean time to transformation (months) 48 (Mild) 38 (Moderate) 25 (Severe) 132 (Severe) 67 (CIS) 29 (Mild) 22 (Moderate) 36 (Severe)
Minimum follow-up (months)
Mean follow-up (months)
Methodology and setting
Percentage follow-up
Study
Country
Ricci 52
89
111
Retrospective hospital (records)
57
Italy
NR
84
Plch 51
Czech
146
60
74
99
Retrospective hospital (records) Retrospective hospital (path) Prospective hospital (records) Retrospective hospital (records)
52
Republic
Sllamniku 53 USA NR
100
317
59
60
Minni 2
Italy
NR
39
NR
100
58
54
Gallo 49
Italy
101
15
173 (Mild) 56 (Moderate) 43 (Severe)
100
116
56
Jeannon 50
UK
72 (median) 15
11 (Combined) 100
113
Retrospective hospital (records)
56
Uno 54
Japan 59
13
60 (Mild) 36 (Severe)
100
26
Retrospective hospital (records ⁄ path)
NR
Blackwell 48
USA 73
12
NR
100
59
Retrospective hospital (records) Retrospective hospital (records)
59
Stenersen 9
Norway 109
12
59 (Severe)
100
41
NR
All studies
940
NR, not recorded; CIS, carcinoma-in-situ.
mation rate (on the transformed scale) against study size (Fig. 2). The expected tendency for larger studies to give central values is seen and there does not appear to be asymmetry or clear evidence of publication bias.
Heterogeneity of studies
The effect of possible bias and heterogeneity between the studies was examined by a funnel plot of transfor
2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd • Clinical Otolaryngology 35, 364–372
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator