HSC Section 6 Nov2016 Green Book

The American Journal of Surgery, Vol 208, No 5, November 2014

been missed as we did not contact study subjects for late- term follow-up or measure tracheal circumference in this retrospective study. PT has been proven to be a safe and cost-effective method for elective tracheostomy. Our study demonstrates that the complication rate, particularly that of tracheal stenosis, after PT is equivalent to that observed after the traditional OT procedure.

3. Holdgaard HO, Pedersen J, Jensen RH, et al. Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomy. A clinical randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998;42:545–50 . 4. Norwood S, Vallina VL, Short K, et al. Incidence of tracheal stenosis and other late complications after percutaneous tracheostomy. Ann Surg 2000;232:233–41 . 5. Kornblith LZ, Burlew CC, Moore EE, et al. One thousand bedside percutaneous tracheostomies in the surgical intensive care unit: time to change the gold standard. JAmColl Surg 2011;212:163–70 . 6. Jackson LS, Davis JW, Kaups KL, et al. Percutaneous tracheostomy: to bronch or not to bronch–that is the question. J Trauma 2011;71:1553–6 . 7. Raghuraman G, Rajan S, Marzouk JK, et al. Is tracheal stenosis caused by percutaneous tracheostomy different from that by surgical tracheos- tomy? Chest 2005;127:879–85 . 8. Ciaglia P, Graniero KD. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Re- sults and long-term follow-up. Chest 1992;101:464–7 . 9. Cobean R, Beals M, Moss C, et al. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A safe, cost-effective bedside procedure. Arch Surg 1996;131:265–71 . 10. Wood DE. Tracheostomy. Chest Surg Clin N Am 1996;6:749–64 .

References

1. Freeman BD, Isabella K, Lin N, et al. A meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Chest 2000;118:1412–8 . 2. Friedman Y, Fildes J, Mizock B, et al. Comparison of percutaneous and surgical tracheostomies. Chest 1996;110:480–5 .

172