HSC Section 8_April 2017

Electroneurography for Facial Palsy

is useful to predict the prognosis only during the first 2 weeks after the onset. After then, accurate prediction using ENoG is difficult because the regeneration process already begins at the proximal end or the collateral neural circuit can develop from a healthy nerve around a degenerated nerve. Conclusion ENoG is considered the most valuable test to predict the prognosis and its main indication is acute complete facial pa- ralysis. Both the percentage degeneration and rate of degen- eration are prognostic indicators. In Bell’s palsy, percentage degeneration of more than 90% within 14 days post-onset of complete paralysis indicates poor prognosis in more than 50% of cases. Although electrophysiological tests provide useful neuro- physiological information and serve as a guide to the man- agement of acute facial paralysis, they have some limitations. They cannot distinguish between axonotmesis and neurot- mesis and are not useful in cases of incomplete paralysis. In addition, they cannot give any useful information within first 72 hours after the onset. Conflicts of interest The author has no financial conflicts of interest. REFERENCES 1) Mattox DE. Clinical disorders of the facial nerve. In: Flint PW, Haugh- ey BH, Lund VJ, Niparko JK, Richardson MA, Robbins KT, et al., editors. Cummings Otolaryngology: Head & Neck Surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Science Health Science;2014. p.2617-28. 2) Linstrom CJ. Objective facial motion analysis in patients with facial nerve dysfunction. Laryngoscope 2002;112(7 Pt 1):1129-47. 3) Neely JG, Wang KX, Shapland CA, Sehizadeh A, Wang A. Com- puterized objective measurement of facial motion: normal variation and test-retest reliability. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:1488-92. 4) Frey M, Tzou CH, Michaelidou M, Pona I, Hold A, Placheta E, et al. 3D video analysis of facial movements. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2011;19:639-46, viii. 5) Hadlock TA, Urban LS. Toward a universal, automated facial mea- surement tool in facial reanimation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2012;14: 277-82. 6) Esslen E. Electrodiagnosis of facial palsy. In: Miehlke A, editor. Surgery of the Facial Nerve. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders;1973.

p.45-51. 7) Thomander L, Stälberg E. Electroneurography in the prognostica- tion of Bell’s palsy. Acta Otolaryngol 1981;92:221-37. 8) May M, Blumenthal F, Klein SR. Acute Bell’s palsy: prognostic val- ue of evoked electromyography, maximal stimulation, and other elec- trical tests. Am J Otol 1983;5:1-7. 9) Fisch U. Prognostic value of electrical tests in acute facial paralysis. Am J Otol 1984;5:494-8. 10) Sillman JS, Niparko JK, Lee SS, Kileny PR. Prognostic value of evoked and standard electromyography in acute facial paralysis. Oto- laryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;107:377-81. 11) Smith IM, Maynard C, Mountain RE, Barr-Hamilton R, Armstrong M, Murray JA. The prognostic value of facial electroneurography in Bell’s palsy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1994;19:201-3. 12) May M, Shambaugh GE. Facial nerve paralysis. In: Paparella MM, Shumrick DA, Gluckman JL, Meyerhoff W, editors. Otolaryngolo- gy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders;1991. p.1106. 13) Sunderland S, Bradley KC. Endoneurial tube shrinkage in the distal segment of a severed nerve. J Comp Neurol 1950;93:411-20. 14) Kreutzberg GW, Schubert P. Volume changes in the axon during re- generation. Acta Neuropathol 1971;17:220-6. 15) May M. Anatomy of the facial nerve (spatial orientation of fibers in the temporal bone). Laryngoscope 1973;83:1311-29. 16) Sunderland S. The anatomy and physiology of nerve injury. Muscle Nerve 1990;13:771-84. 17) Campbell WW. Evaluation and management of peripheral nerve in- jury. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119:1951-65. 18) Fisch U, Felix H. On the pathogenesis of Bell’s palsy. Acta Otolaryn- gol 1983;95:532-8. 19) Seddon HJ. Three types of nerve injury. Brain 1943;66:238-87. 20) Sunderland S. A classification of peripheral nerve injuries produc- ing loss of function. Brain 1951;74:491-516. 21) Laumans EP, Jongkees LB. On the prognpsis of peeripheral facial paralysis of endotemporal origin. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1963; 72:621-36. 22) Hughes GB, Nodar RH, Williams GW. Analysis of test-retest vari- ability in facial electroneurography. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1983;91:290-3. 23) Gantz BJ, Gmuer AA, Holliday M, Fisch U. Electroneurographic evaluation of the facial nerve. Method and technical problems. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1984;93(4 Pt 1):394-8. 24) Coker NJ. Facial electroneurography: analysis of techniques and cor- relation with degenerating motoneurons. Laryngoscope 1992;102: 747-59. 25) Raslan WF, Wiet R, Zealear DL. A statistical study of ENoG test error. Laryngoscope 1988;98(8 Pt 1):891-3. 26) Esslen E. The acute facial palsies: investigations on the localization and pathogenesis of meato-labyrinthine facial palsies. Berlin: Spring- er-Verlag;1976. 27) Fisch U. Maximal nerve excitability testing vs electroneuronogra- phy. Arch Otolaryngol 1980;106:352-7. 28) Fisch U. Surgery for Bell’s palsy. Arch Otolaryngol 1981;107:1-11.

J Audiol Otol 2016;20(1):8-12

221