xRead - Incorporating Artificial Intelligence into Clinical Practice (March 2026)
Ng et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
(2025) 25:236
Page 17 of 24
Key Findings Novel Features
This study establishes a hybrid method that simultaneously generates and
evaluates a digital scribe and electronic prescription for diabetes.
The study’s developed system provides the option to review and edit the system generated scribes and prescriptions, reducing the chance of error..
Measured outcomes using AMA Organiza tional Biopsy EHR-specific survey
Reported significant reduction in burnout among physicians, with burnout rates decreasing from 69–43%.
Study achieved a 92% survey completion rate, indicating strong engagement and
usability of ambient AI technology among participants, supporting its potential for broader implementation in healthcare settings.
Voice-driven intelligent system for generating medical scribes and pre
scriptions, demonstrating ease of use and proven viability; employed both extractive and abstractive summari zation, selecting an LSTM model for higher accuracy over traditional NLP approaches.
Clinicians using AI documenta tion tools experienced lower
frustration and less time spent on documentation.
Significant reduction in burnout as measured by the Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index (PFI); achieved by
reducing the burden of documenta tion and cognitive load required of clinicians during a consultation
AI Transcription
Proficiency (paper
specific outcomes)
NR NR Mean ratings for
scribe (mean ± SD): 4.33 ± 0.022
Number of attempts for performing the
assigned tasks for all
patients (mean ± SD): 1.285 ± 0.034 Task Completion
Time for performing the assigned tasks
for all patients (mean minutes ± SD): 2.28 ± 0.51
Number of asked help for performing the
assigned tasks for all
patients: 0.283 ± 0.024 Overall satisfaction (out of 5): 4.67
Easiness to use (out of 5): 4.22
Easiness to learn (out of 5): 4.27
Recommend to Oth ers (out of 5): 4.75
Time in documen tation, frustration levels NR Decreased documen tation time, frustra
tion, and after-hours EHR use
NR 4.16 (pre), 3.16 (post)* 5.0 (pre), 4.2 (post)
3.6 (pre), 2.5 (post)*
6.1 (pre), 6.5 (post)
Metric (F1 score,
Precision, Recall, WER)
Burnout score
(Stanford Profes
sional Fulfillment Index)
Work exhaustion score
Interpersonal dis
engagement score Professional fulfillment
Comparator Type Subcategories Performance Non-blinded comparison
Pre-intervention ver
sus post-intervention
NR Pre and
post-intervention
Standard
Handwritten scribe
Clinician
survey on EHR experience
Table 2 (continued)
Study Reference Islam et
al., 2024 [26]
Liu et
al., 2024 [27]
Misurac et al.,
2024
[28]
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online