xRead - Incorporating Artificial Intelligence into Clinical Practice (March 2026)
Ng et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
(2025) 25:236
Page 20 of 24
Table 3 Detailed risk of bias assessment for the various studies using QUADAS-2 tool Study Risk of bias
Applicability concerns
Patient Selection
Index Test
Reference Standard
Flow and Timing
Patient Selection
Index Test Reference Standard
Almario et al., 2015 [13] Almario et al., 2015 [14]
LOW LOW LOW HIGH LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW HIGH LOW HIGH HIGH LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW
LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW HIGH LOW LOW HIGH LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW HIGH LOW
LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW
LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW
LOW LOW LOW HIGH LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW LOW LOW HIGH LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW HIGH
LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW
Biro et al., 2025 [32]
Blackley et al., 2020 [21] Balloch et al., 2024 [4] Bundy et al., 2024 [23]
UNCLEAR
UNCLEAR
LOW UNCLEAR
Cao et al., 2024 [24]
LOW LOW
LOW LOW
LOW LOW LOW LOW
Duggan et al., 2025 [33] Goss et al., 2019 [20] Harbele et al., 2024 [25] Happe et al., 2003 [10] Hodgson et al., 2017 [16] Islam et al., 2024 [26] Issenman et al., 2004 [12] Kodish-Wachs et al., 2018 [17] Misurac et al., 2024 [28] Mohr et al., 2003 [11] Moryousef et al., 2025 [35] Owens et al., 2024 [29] Sezgin et al., 2024 [30] Suominen et al., 2015 [15] van Buchem et al., 2024 [31] Van Woensel et al., 2022 [22] Shah et al., 2025 [36] Liu et al., 2024 [27] Lybarger et al., 2018 [18] Ma et al., 2025 [34]
UNCLEAR
UNCLEAR
UNCLEAR
LOW UNCLEAR
LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW HIGH
LOW HIGH LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW
LOW LOW LOW LOW HIGH LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW HIGH LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW
UNCLEAR
UNCLEAR
UNCLEAR
UNCLEAR
UNCLEAR
UNCLEAR
UNCLEAR
Zhou et al., 2018 [19] Zick et al., 2001 [9]
LOW HIGH
Fig. 2 Stacked bar chart displaying risk of bias of the studies reviewed using QUADAS-2 tool
transcription technology in healthcare and highlight cer tain common challenges to overcome in order to advance the field. A broad array of AI models and software systems emerged from the review, from older ASR-based tools, such as Dragon NaturallySpeaking Medical Suite and
Dragon Medical One [9, 12, 15, 16, 20], to more advanced products that incorporate LLMs, including DAX Copi lot and GPT-4–driven systems [31, 33, 34]. The newer studies tend to describe ambient AI scribes, which not only transcribe but also summarize and repurpose clini cal notes. Such systems may overcome some limitations
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online