xRead - Incorporating Artificial Intelligence into Clinical Practice (March 2026)

12. “OCEBM Levels of Evidence,” accessed February 18, 2024, https://​ www.​cebm.​ox.​ac.​uk/​resou​rces/​level​s-​of-​evide​nce/​ocebm​-​level​ s-​of-​evidence. 13. Z. Zhang, L. Yao, W. Wang, B. Jiang, F. Xia, and X. Li, “A Bibliometric Analysis of 34,692 Publications on Thyroid Cancer by Machine Learning: How Much Has Been Done in the Past Three Decades?,” Frontiers in Oncology 11 (2021): 673733, https://​doi.​org/​10.​3389/​fonc.​ 2021.​673733. 14. C. Feng, C. Tian, L. Huang, H. Chen, Y. Feng, and S. Chang, “A Bibliometric Analysis of the Landscape of Parathyroid Carcinoma Research Based on the PubMed (2000-2021),” Frontiers in Oncology 12 (2022): 824201, https://​doi.​org/​10.​3389/​fonc.​2022.​824201. 15. Z. Zhang, F. Xia, and X. Li, “A Comprehensive Overview of the Parathyroid Tumor From the Past Two Decades: Machine Learning-­ Based Bibliometric Analysis,” Frontiers in Endocrinology 12 (2021): 811555, https://​doi.​org/​10.​3389/​fendo.​2021.​811555. 16. M. Makhoul, A. E. Melkane, P. E. Khoury, C. E. Hadi, and N. Matar, “A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study: ChatGPT 3.5 Versus Diverse Levels of Medical Experts in the Diagnosis of ENT Diseases,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 281, no. 5 (2024): 2717–2721, https://​ doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s0040​5-​024-​08509​-​z. 17. R. S. Jacobson, M. J. Becich, R. J. Bollag, et al., “A Federated Network for Translational Cancer Research Using Clinical Data and Biospecimens,” Cancer Research 75, no. 24 (2015): 5194–5201, https://​ doi.​org/​10.​1158/​0008-​5472.​CAN-​15-​1973. 18. R. Dang and C. Hanba, “A Large Language Model's Assessment of Methodology Reporting in Head and Neck Surgery,” American Journal of Otolaryngology 45, no. 2 (2023): 104145, https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​am joto.​2023.​104145. 19. A. Koroleva and P. Paroubek, “A Machine Learning Algorithm and Tools for Automatic Detection of Spin (Distorted Presentation of Results) in Articles Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials,” Trials 20, no. Suppl 1 (2019): 122–123, https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s1306​3-​019-​3688-​6. 20. Y. A. Alohali, M. S. Fayed, T. Mesallam, Y. Abdelsamad, F. Almuhawas, and A. Hagr, “A Machine Learning Model to Predict Citation Counts of Scientific Papers in Otology Field,” BioMed Research International 2022 (2022): 2239152, https://​doi.​org/​10.​1155/​2022/​ 2239152. 21. S. Cavalieri, C. Vener, M. LeBlanc, et al., “A Multicenter Randomized Trial for Quality of Life Evaluation by Non-invasive Intelligent Tools During Post-Curative Treatment Follow-Up for Head and Neck Cancer: Clinical Study Protocol,” Frontiers in Oncology 13 (2023): 1048593, https://​doi.​org/​10.​3389/​fonc.​2023.​1048593. 22. V. Vasan, C. Cheng, D. Lerner, D. Vujovic, M. Van Gerwen, and A. M. Iloreta, “A Natural Language Processing Approach to Uncover Patterns Among Online Ratings of Otolaryngologists,” Journal of Laryngology and Otology 137, no. 12 (2023): 1384–1388, https://​doi.​org/​ 10.​1017/​S0022​21512​3000476. 23. C. Long, K. Lowe, J. Zhang, et al., “A Novel Evaluation Model for Assessing ChatGPT on Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Certification Examinations: Performance Study,” JMIR Medical Education 10 (2024):e49970, https://​doi.​org/​10.​2196/​49970​. 24. S. Mandava, S. L. Oyer, and S. S. Park, “A Quantitative Analysis of Twitter (“X”) Trends in the Discussion of Rhinoplasty,” Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology 9, no. 1 (2024): e1227, https://​doi.​org/​10.​ 1002/​lio2.​1227. 25. J. R. Lechien, C. M. Chiesa-Estomba, R. Baudouin, and S. Hans, “Accuracy of ChatGPT in Head and Neck Oncological Board Decisions: Preliminary Findings,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 281, no. 4 (2024): 2105–2114, https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s0040​5-​023-​ 08326​-​w. 26. J. R. Lechien, G. Briganti, and L. A. Vaira, “Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and − 4 in Providing Scientific References in Otolaryngology-Head and

Acknowledgments Special thanks to Terri McKellar, Medical Librarian, for her help in op timizing our search strategy.

Ethics Statement The authors have nothing to report.

Consent All authors consent for publication.

Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement All data generated during the current study are available from the cor responding author on reasonable request.

References 1. A. Amanian, A. Heffernan, M. Ishii, F. X. Creighton, and A. Thamboo, “The Evolution and Application of Artificial Intelligence in Rhinology: A State of the Art Review,” Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 169, no. 1 (2023): 21–30, https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​01945​99822​1110076. 2. B. S. Wilson, D. L. Tucci, D. A. Moses, et al., “Harnessing the Power of Artificial Intelligence in Otolaryngology and the Communication Sciences,” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 23, no. 3 (2022): 319–349, https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s1016​2-​022-​00846​-​2. 3. S. P. Haider, K. Sharaf, P. Baumeister, and C. A. Reichel, “Künstliche Intelligenz in der Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde,” HNO 70, no. 2 (2022): 87–93, https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s0010​6-​021-​01095​-​0. 4. A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, et al., “Attention Is all You Need,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (2023): 3762, https://​doi.​org/​10.​48550/​arXiv.​1706.​03762​. 5. M. Paris, “ChatGPT Hits 100 Million Users, Google Invests In AI Bot And CatGPT Goes Viral,” 2023 Forbes, accessed February 18, 2024, https://​www.​forbes.​com/​sites/​marti​nepar​is/​2023/​02/​03/​chatg​ pt-​hits-​100-​milli​on-​micro​soft-​unlea​shes-​ai-​bots-​and-​catgp​t-​goes-​ viral/​. 6. CanMEDS Framework, accessed February 18, 2024, https://​www.​ royal​colle​ge.​ca/​en/​canme​ds/​canme​ds-​frame​work.​html. 7. ACGME Core Competencies. Graduate Medical Education, accessed February 18, 2024, https://​med.​stanf​ord.​edu/​gme/​house​staff/​curre​nt/​ core_​compe​tenci​es.​html. 8. J. R. Lechien and A. Rameau, “Applications of ChatGPT in Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery: A State of the Art Review,” Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 171, no. 3 (2024): 667–677, https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​ohn.​807. 9. A. C. Tricco, E. Lillie, W. Zarin, et al., “PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation,” Annals of Internal Medicine 169, no. 7 (2018): 467–473, https://​doi.​org/​10.​7326/​ M18-​0850. 10. J. McGowan, M. Sampson, D. M. Salzwedel, E. Cogo, V. Foerster, and C. Lefebvre, “PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 75 (2016): 40–46, https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​jclin​epi.​2016.​01.​021. 11. M. J. Page, J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, et al., “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews,” British Medical Journal 372 (2021): n71, https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmj.​n71.

3057

Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online