xRead - Incorporating Artificial Intelligence into Clinical Practice (March 2026)
Neck Surgery,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 281, no. 4 (2024): 2159–2165, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08441-8. 27. L. A. Vaira, J. R. Lechien, V. Abbate, et al., “Accuracy of ChatGPT- Generated Information on Head and Neck and Oromaxillofacial Surgery: A Multicenter Collaborative Analysis,” Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 170, no. 6 (2024): 1492–1503, https://doi.org/10. 1002/ohn.489. 28. E. Terwilliger, G. Bcharah, H. Bcharah, E. Bcharah, C. Richardson, and P. Scheffler, “Advancing Medical Education: Performance of Generative Artificial Intelligence Models on Otolaryngology Board Preparation Questions With Image Analysis Insights,” Cureus 16, no. 7 (2024): e64204, https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.64204. 29. H. Alemzadeh, J. Raman, N. Leveson, Z. Kalbarczyk, and R. K. Iyer, “Adverse Events in Robotic Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 14Years of Fda Data,” PLoS One 11, no. 4 (2016): e0151470, https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pone.0151470. 30. J. M. Carnino, N. Y. K. Chong, H. Bayly, L. R. Salvati, H. S. Tiwana, and J. R. Levi, “AI-Generated Text in Otolaryngology Publications: A Comparative Analysis Before and After the Release of ChatGPT,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 281, no. 11 (2024): 6141– 6146, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08834-3. 31. K. Wei, C. Fritz, and K. Rajasekaran, “Answering Head and Neck Cancer Questions: An Assessment of ChatGPT Responses,” American Journal of Otolaryngology 45, no. 1 (2024): 104085, https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.amjoto.2023.104085. 32. M. Mayo-Yáñez, L. González-Torres, A. M. Saibene, et al., “Application of ChatGPT as a Support Tool in the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Bacterial Tonsillitis,” Health Technology 14, no. 4 (2024): 773–779, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-024-00858-3. 33. G. Pugliese, A. Maccari, E. Felisati, et al., “Are Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models a Reliable Tool for Difficult Differential Diagnosis? An a Posteriori Analysis of a Peculiar Case of Necrotizing Otitis Externa,” Clinical Case Reports 11, no. 9 (2023): e7933, https://doi. org/10.1002/ccr3.7933. 34. S. Høj, S. F. Thomsen, H. Meteran, T. Sigsgaard, and H. Meteran, “Artificial Intelligence and Allergic Rhinitis: Does ChatGPT Increase or Impair the Knowledge?,” Journal of Public Health 46, no. 1 (2024): 123–126, https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad219. 35. J. Langlie, B. Kamrava, L. J. Pasick, C. Mei, and M. E. Hoffer, “Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT: An Otolaryngology Patient's Ally or Foe?,” American Journal of Otolaryngology 45, no. 3 (2024): 104220, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104220. 36. C. Marshall, J. Forbes, M. D. Seidman, L. Roldan, and J. Atkins, “Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis in Otologic Patients: Is It Ready to be Your Doctor?,” Otology & Neurotology 45, no. 8 (2024): 863–869, https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004267. 37. A. Abdel-Hafez, M. Jones, M. Ebrahimabadi, et al., “Artificial Intelligence in Medical Referrals Triage Based on Clinical Prioritization Criteria,” Frontiers in Digital Health 5 (2023): 1192975, https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1192975. 38. K. L. Kehl, W. Xu, A. Gusev, et al., “Artificial Intelligence-Aided Clinical Annotation of a Large Multi-Cancer Genomic Dataset,” Nature Communications 12, no. 1 (2021): 7304, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467- 021-27358-6. 39. J. M. Carnino, W. R. Pellegrini, M. Willis, et al., “Assessing Chatgpt's Responses to Otolaryngology Patient Questions,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology 133, no. 7 (2024): 658–664, https://doi.org/ 10.1177/00034894241249621. 40. B. Cavnar Helvaci, S. Hepsen, B. Candemir, et al., “Assessing the Accuracy and Reliability of Chatgpt's Medical Responses About Thyroid Cancer,” International Journal of Medical Informatics 191 (2024): 105593, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105593.
41. A. Frosolini, L. Franz, S. Benedetti, et al., “Assessing the Accuracy of ChatGPT References in Head and Neck and ENT Disciplines,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 280, no. 11 (2023): 5129– 5133, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08205-4. 42. K. Ji, J. Han, G. Zhai, and J. Liu, “Assessing the Capabilities of Generative Pretrained Transformer-4 in Addressing Open-Ended Inquiries of Oral Cancer,” International Dental Journal 75, no. 1 (2025): 158–165, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2024.06.024. 43. G. Palacios, A. Noreña, and A. Londero, “Assessing the Heterogeneity of Complaints Related to Tinnitus and Hyperacusis From an Unsupervised Machine Learning Approach: An Exploratory Study,” Audiology & Neurotology 25, no. 4 (2020): 174–189, https://doi.org/10. 1159/000504741. 44. G. S. Hill, J. L. Fischer, N. L. Watson, C. A. Riley, and A. M. Tolisano, “Assessing the Quality of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Patient Counseling for Rhinosinusitis,” International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology 14, no. 10 (2024): 1634–1637, https://doi.org/10.1002/alr. 23387. 45. B. Schmidl, T. Hütten, S. Pigorsch, et al., “Assessing the Role of Advanced Artificial Intelligence as a Tool in Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Decision-Making for Primary Head and Neck Cancer Cases,” Frontiers in Oncology 14 (2024): 1353031, https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc. 2024.1353031. 46. Z. Wang, Z. Zhang, A. Traverso, A. Dekker, L. Qian, and P. Sun, “Assessing the Role of GPT-4 in Thyroid Ultrasound Diagnosis and Treatment Recommendations: Enhancing Interpretability With a Chain of Thought Approach,” Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery 14, no. 2 (2024): 1602–1615, https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-1180. 47. B. Schmidl, T. Hütten, S. Pigorsch, et al., “Assessing the Use of the Novel Tool Claude 3 in Comparison to ChatGPT 4.0 as an Artificial Intelligence Tool in the Diagnosis and Therapy of Primary Head and Neck Cancer Cases,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 281, no. 11 (2024): 6099–6109, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08828-1. 48. E. E. Dencker, A. Bonde, A. Troelsen, and M. Sillesen, “Assessing the Utility of Natural Language Processing for Detecting Postoperative Complications From Free Medical Text,” BJS Open 8, no. 2 (2024): zrae020, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae020. 49. C. R. Buhr, H. Smith, T. Huppertz, et al., “Assessing Unknown Potential-Quality and Limitations of Different Large Language Models in the Field of Otorhinolaryngology,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 144, no. 3 (2024): 237–242, https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2352843. 50. A. P. Mahajan, C. L. Shabet, J. Smith, S. F. Rudy, R. A. Kupfer, and L. A. Bohm, “Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Performance on the Otolaryngology Residency in-Service Exam,” OTO Open 7, no. 4 (2023): e98, https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.98. 51. L. Mnajjed and R. J. Patel, “Assessment of ChatGPT Generated Educational Material for Head and Neck Surgery Counseling,” American Journal of Otolaryngology 45, no. 5 (2024): 104410, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104410. 52. F. J. Chen, J. Nightingale, W. S. You, D. Anderson, and D. Morrissey, “Assessment of ChatGPT vs. Bard vs. Guidelines in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Preclinical Management of Otorhinolaryngological (ENT) Emergencies,” Australian Journal of Otolaryngology 7 (2024): 19, https://doi.org/10.21037/ajo-24-1. 53. M. S. Deniz and B. Y. Guler, “Assessment of Chatgpt's Adherence to ETA-Thyroid Nodule Management Guideline Over Two Different Time Intervals 14 Days Apart: In Binary and Multiple-Choice Queries,” Endocrine 85, no. 2 (2024): 794–802, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020- 024-03750-2. 54. A. M. Yengo-Kahn, N. Hibshman, C. M. Bonfield, et al., “Association of Preinjury Medical Diagnoses With Pediatric Persistent Postconcussion Symptoms in Electronic Health Records,” Journal of
3058
The Laryngoscope, 2025
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online