xRead - Incorporating Artificial Intelligence into Clinical Practice (March 2026)

Carnino et al.

Page 6

release in November 2022, suggests a substantial influence on researchers’ writing practices. However, concerns persist regarding the accuracy of AI-generated content and the potential for misinformation, commonly referred to as “AI hallucinations.” As AI tools become more widely used, it would be interesting to observe whether the percentage of AI-generated content continues to rise and how this trend further influences scientific publishing. As we navigate the evolving landscape of AI in academic publishing, our recommendations advocate for collaboration between journals and AI experts to refine detection tools, uphold transparency, and ensure the integrity of scholarly discourse. Despite the limitations of our study, it serves as a stepping-stone, urging future research to address these constraints and delve deeper into the intricate relationship between AI, scientific communication, and publication integrity.

Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

1. Yu KH, Beam AL, Kohane IS (2018) Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nat Biomed Eng 2:719– 731 [PubMed: 31015651] 2. Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, Dong Y, Li H, Ma S et al. (2017) Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2:230–243 [PubMed: 29507784] 3. Goodman RS, Patrinely JR Jr., Osterman T, Wheless L, Johnson DB (2023) On the cusp: considering the impact of artificial intelligence language models in healthcare. Med 4:139–140 [PubMed: 36905924] 4. Johnson KB, Wei WQ, Weeraratne D, Frisse ME, Misulis K, Rhee K et al. (2021) Precision Medicine, AI, and the future of Personalized Health Care. Clin Transl Sci 14:86–93 [PubMed: 32961010] 5. Davenport T, Kalakota R (2019) The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthc J 6:94–98 6. Brameier DT, Alnasser AA, Carnino JM, Bhashyam AR, von Keudell AG, Weaver MJ (2023) Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedic surgery: can a large Language Model write a Believable Orthopaedic Journal article? J Bone Joint Surg Am 105:1388–1392 [PubMed: 37437021] 7. Dergaa I, Chamari K, Zmijewski P, Ben Saad H (2023) From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biol Sport 40:615–622 [PubMed: 37077800] 8. Lechien JR, Gorton A, Robertson J, Vaira LA (2023) Is ChatGPT-4 Accurate in Proofread a Manuscript in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck surgery? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 9. King MR (2023) chatGpt. A conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education. Cell Mol Bioeng 16:1–2 [PubMed: 36660590] 10. Liebrenz M, Schleifer R, Buadze A, Bhugra D, Smith A (2023) Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing. Lancet Digit Health 5:e105–e6 [PubMed: 36754725] 11. Ali MJ, Djalilian A (2023) Readership awareness series - paper 4: chatbots and ChatGPT - ethical considerations in scientific publications. Semin Ophthalmol 38:403–404 [PubMed: 36945119] 12. Owens B (2023) How Nature readers are using ChatGPT. Nature 615:20 [PubMed: 36807343] 13. Ruksakulpiwat S, Kumar A, Ajibade A (2023) Using ChatGPT in Medical Research: current status and future directions. J Multidiscip Healthc 16:1513–1520 [PubMed: 37274428] 14. Temsah MH, Altamimi I, Jamal A, Alhasan K, Al-Eyadhy A (2023) ChatGPT surpasses 1000 publications on PubMed: envisioning the Road ahead. Cureus 15:e44769 [PubMed: 37809155]

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2025 November 01.