xRead - Nasal Obstruction (September 2024) Full Articles
20426984, 0, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alr.23262, Wiley Online Library on [02/01/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
205
ICAR SINONASAL TUMORS
TABLE XXII.A.1 (Continued) Study
Year LOE Study design Study groups
Clinical endpoints Conclusion
1. CD8 + TILs and TMIT were correlated with the histological subtype of ITAC and with improved OS 2. The modest percentage of CD8 high/PD-L1-positive cases indicates that ITAC is a lowly immunogenic tumor type 3. Sinonasal ITACs, especially the papillary and colonic subtypes, may benefit from 1. Surgery and RT associated with improved OS 2. Advanced age, comorbidities, advanced tumor grade, and stage associated with worse OS 3. Chemotherapy not associated withOS extension to the contralateral nasal fossa at preoperative imaging and intraoperative assessment can be safely managed with unilateral resection 2. Unilateral resection provides shorter hospitalization, preservation of some olfactory function, and oncological outcomes comparable to bilateral resection 3. Occupational exposure to wood dusts or other inhalants is not per se an indication for bilateral resection Factors influencing survival rates are local recurrence, development of distant metastases, tumor stage (pT classification), and infiltrated surgical margins Prognostic factors for both OS and DFS included pT stage, margin status, and tumor grade therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors 1. ITAC confined to one ethmoid without any
To evaluate CD8 + TILs and TMIT
Garcìa-Marìn et al. 1163
2020 4
Retrospective case series
133 cases of sinonasal ITAC treated with primary surgery followed by
(combining CD8 + TILs and PD-L1) as predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy
adjuvant RT (in selected cases)
Patel et al. 1164
2020 4
Retrospective database study (NCDB)
553 cases of
OS
adenocarcinoma No distinction between ITAC and non-ITAC
1. OS 2. DSS 3. RFS 4. LRFS 5. Morbidity and functional
Schreiber et al. 374
54 cases of sinonasal ITAC divided into
2018 4
Retrospective
case–control study
two groups: patients treated with unilateral ERTC ( n = 27) versus patients treated with bilateral ERTC ( n = 27)
outcomes between the two groups
Campet al. 1161
2016 4
Retrospective
123 cases of sinonasal ITAC surgically treated with EEA
1. OS 2. DSS 3. RFS
case–control study
Nicolai et al. 1146 2016 4
1. OS 2. DFS
169 cases of sinonasal ITAC surgically treated with EEA with or without transnasal craniectomy or combined CFR followed by postoperative RT (in selected cases)
Retrospective
case–control study
(Continues)
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online