xRead - Nasal Obstruction (September 2024) Full Articles

20426984, 0, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alr.23262, Wiley Online Library on [02/01/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License

388

KUANetal.

Otorhinolaryngol . 2016;273(12):4343-4350. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s00405-016-4181-4 261. Vergez S, Martin-Dupont N, Lepage B, De Bonnecaze G, Decotte A, Serrano E. Endoscopic vs transfacial resection of sinonasal adenocarcinomas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 2012;146(5):848-853. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599811434903 262. Nicolai P, Villaret AB, Bottazzoli M, Rossi E, Valsecchi MG. Ethmoid adenocarcinoma—from craniofacial to endoscopic resections: a single-institution experience over 25 years. Oto laryngol Head Neck Surg . 2011;145(2):330-337. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0194599811403873 263. Huber GF, Gengler C, Walter C, Roth T, Huber A, Holzmann D. Adenocarcinoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses: single-institution review of diagnosis, histology, and outcome. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 2011;40(1):34-39. 264. Grosjean R, Gallet P, Baumann C, Jankowski R. Transfa cial versus endoscopic approach in the treatment of wood worker’s nasal adenocarcinomas. Head Neck . 2015;37(3):347 356. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23601 265. Gore MR. Treatment, outcomes, and demographics in sinonasal sarcoma: a systematic review of the litera ture. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord . 2018;18:4. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s12901-018-0052-5 266. Guo L, Liu J, Sun X, Wang D. Sinonasal tract chondrosar coma: 18-year experience at a single institution. Auris Nasus Larynx . 2014;41(3):290-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2013. 10.011 267. Cao W, Guan B, Yu A, et al. Treatment and outcomes of endo scopic surgery and traditional open resection in sinonasal mucosal melanoma. Acta Otolaryngol . 2017;137(8):862-867. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2017.1300939 268. Yin G, Guo W, Chen X, Huang Z. Prognosis of endo scopic surgery and traditional open resection in mucosal melanoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus. Melanoma Res . 2019;29(1):47-52. https://doi.org/10.1097/ CMR.0000000000000516 269. Won TB, Choi KY, Rhee CS, et al. Treatment outcomes of sinonasal malignant melanoma: a Korean multicenter study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol . 2015;5(10):950-959. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/alr.21558 270. Swegal W, Koyfman S, Scharpf J, et al. Endoscopic and open surgical approaches to locally advanced sinonasal melanoma: comparing the therapeutic benefits. JAMA Oto laryngol Head Neck Surg . 2014;140(9):840-845. https://doi.org/ 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1321 271. Sayed Z, Migliacci JC, Cracchiolo JR, et al. Association of sur gical approach and margin status with oncologic outcomes following gross total resection for sinonasal melanoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 2017;143(12):1220-1227. https:// doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2017.2011 272. Miglani A, Patel SH, Kosiorek HE, Hinni ML, Hayden RE, Lal D. Endoscopic resection of sinonasal mucosal melanoma has comparable outcomes to open approaches. Am J Rhinol Allergy . 2017;31(3):200-204. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2017. 31.4435 273. Meng XJ, Ao HF, Huang WT, et al. Impact of different surgical and postoperative adjuvant treatment modalities on survival of sinonasal malignant melanoma. BMCCancer . 2014;14:608. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-608

247. Karligkiotis A, Lepera D, Volpi L, et al. Survival outcomes after endoscopic resection for sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma arising on inverted papilloma. Head Neck . 2016;38(11):1604 1614. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24481 248. Wertz A, Hollon T, Marentette LJ, Sullivan SE, McHugh JB, McKean EL. Surgical treatment of olfactory neuroblastoma: major complication rates, progression free and overall sur vival. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base . 2018;79(2):151-155. https://doi. org/10.1055/s-0037-1605593 249. Tajudeen BA, Arshi A, Suh JD, et al. Esthesioneuroblastoma: an update on the UCLA experience, 2002-2013. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base . 2015;76(1):43-49. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034 1390011 250. Song CM, Won TB, Lee CH, Kim DY, Rhee CS. Treat ment modalities and outcomes of olfactory neuroblastoma. Laryngoscope . 2012;122(11):2389-2395. https://doi.org/10.1002/ lary.23641 251. Petruzzelli GJ, Howell JB, Pederson A, et al. Multidisciplinary treatment of olfactory neuroblastoma: patterns of failure and management of recurrence. Am J Otolaryngol . 2015;36(4):547 553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2015.02.008 252. Mays AC, Bell D, Ferrarotto R, et al. Early stage olfactory neu roblastoma and the impact of resecting dura and olfactory bulb. Laryngoscope . 2018;128(6):1274-1280. https://doi.org/10. 1002/lary.26908 253. Kim N, Lee CG, Kim EH, et al. Patterns of failures after surgical resection in olfactory neuroblastoma. J Neuroon col . 2019;141(2):459-466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018 03056-0 254. Barinsky GL, Azmy MC, Kilic S, et al. Comparison of open and endoscopic approaches in the resection of esthesioneuroblas toma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol . 2021;130(2):136-141. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0003489420939582 255. Devaiah AK, Andreoli MT. Treatment of esthesioneuroblas toma: a 16-year meta-analysis of 361 patients. Laryngoscope . 2009;119(7):1412-1416. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20280 256. Morgenstern PF, Ivasyk I, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. The evo lution of endoscopic skull base surgery outcomes: defining the edge of the envelope. World Neurosurg . 2019;124:491-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.119 257. Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DMS, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal versus open repair of anterior skull base CSF leak, meningocele, and encephalocele: a system atic review of outcomes. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg . 2013;74(4):239-250. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1325636 258. Fu TS, Monteiro E, Muhanna N, Goldstein DP, de Almeida JR. Comparison of outcomes for open ver sus endoscopic approaches for olfactory neuroblastoma: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Head Neck . 2016;38(Suppl. 1):E2306-2316. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24233 259. Meccariello G, Deganello A, Choussy O, et al. Endoscopic nasal versus open approach for the management of sinonasal adenocarcinoma: a pooled-analysis of 1826 patients. Head Neck . 2016;38(Suppl. 1):E2267-2274. https://doi.org/10.1002/ hed.24182 260. Mortuaire G, Leroy X, Vandenhende-Szymanski C, Chevalier D, Thisse AS. Comparison of endoscopic and external resec tions for sinonasal instestinal-type adenocarcinoma. EurArch