xRead - Nasal Obstruction (September 2024) Full Articles

20426984, 2021, 3, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alr.22741 by Stanford University, Wiley Online Library on [01/07/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License

593

Orlandi et al.

(Continues)

Partial resection of the MT had no effect on olfactory threshold, discrimination and identification.

Recurrence of RS Partial MT resection did not alter the risk of recurrence.

MT preservation group had better endoscopy outcomes. QoL

improvement did not

differ between groups.

Greater burden of disease in MT resection group

based on preoperative

endoscopy, CT imaging, andVAS.

Patients with bilateral MT resection were more likely to have asthma,

AERD, CRSwNP, and prior sinus surgery.

improvement were seen between the 2 groups postoperatively.

Study Year LOE Study Design Study Groups Clinical Endpoint Conclusions Byun 2041 2012 3 Prospective

No differences in QoL

Olfaction (Sniffin’ Sticks)

(SNOT-20 and VAS)

and QoL (RSDI, CSS, SF-36)

Endoscopy, QoL

Olfaction, endoscopy,

Patients with chronic maxillary RS undergoing ESS: 1. MT resection

undergoing ESS:

undergoing ESS:

CRS patients undergoing ESS:

1. Bilateral MT resection 2. Bilateral MT preservation

2. MT preservation

CRSwNP patients

1. MT resection

2. MT preservation

CRSwNP patients

1. MT resection

2. MT preservation

nonrandomized cohort (n = 411)

nonrandomized cohort (n = 52)

nonrandomized cohort (n = 187)

nonrandomized cohort (n = 242)

Soler 2042 2010 3 Prospective

Albu 2060 2010 3 Prospective

Federspil 2053 2008 3 Prospective

TABLE XII-19 (Continued)