xRead - Nasal Obstruction (September 2024) Full Articles

20426984, 2021, 3, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alr.22741 by Stanford University, Wiley Online Library on [01/07/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License

595

Orlandi et al.

(Continues)

Greater burden of disease in MT resection group

based on preoperative CT imaging.

Higher risk of recurrent ethmoiditis in sides with MT resection.

No difference in other outcomes.

Patients with MT resection had a 18% rate of frontal

sinusitis postoperatively when not present preoperatively.

preservation had better endoscopy results.

Nasal airway resistance did not differ between groups.

Patients with MT resection had a 10% rate of frontal sinusitis postoperatively.

Olfaction (VAS) Patients who underwent nasalization, including

MT resection, had better olfaction than patients who underwent traditional

ethmoidectomy, with MT preservation.

Study Year LOE Study Design Study Groups Clinical Endpoint Conclusions Endoscopy and

Patients who had MT

synechiae, maxillary ostial stenosis,

recurrent ethmoiditis, frontal sinusitis

following surgery

rhinomanometry

following surgery

MT lateralization,

Frontal sinusitis

Frontal sinusitis

CRS patients undergoing ESS: 1. MT resection

Patients with CRS undergoing MT resection

undergoing ESS:

Patients with CRS undergoing MT resection

undergoing surgery:

1. Nasalization, with MT preservation 2. Ethmoidectomy

including MT resection

2. MT preservation

CRSwNP patients

1. MT resection

2. MT preservation

CRSwNP patients

Giacchi 2048 2000 4 Retrospective review (n = 50)

Saidi 2047 1998 4 Retrospective review (n = 33)

Brescia 2050 2008 4 Retrospective review (n = 48)

Fortune 2046 1998 4 Retrospective review (n = 115)

Jankowski 2056 1997 4 Retrospective review (n = 78)

TABLE XII-19 (Continued)