xRead - Nasal Obstruction (September 2024) Full Articles
20426984, 2021, 3, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alr.22741 by Stanford University, Wiley Online Library on [01/07/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
622
International consensus statement on rhinosinusitis
–Presence of biofilm 6 of 6 patients had biofilm formation
experienced major symptom improvement.
9 of 12 patients had patent or aeratedFS
months are more effective than those used earlier
2 and 7 patients of 196 required revision or had symptoms
attributable to frontal sinusitis, respectively.
Rolled silicone stent after lynch approach in frontal sinus surgery is safe and effective
No difference between stented and non-stented patients
2-month EMLP cavity stenting does not appear to reduce post-operative FS stenosis
6% of FS stenosed requiring revision
Rains frontal sinus stent is safe and effective Majority (10/12) patients
All stents remained functional and were relatively well-tolerated
6 patients went on to require FSS obliteration
Freeman stent is safe and prevent FSOT blockage
Author Year LOE Study Design Study Groups Clinical Endpoint Conclusions
Frontal stents left in place x 6
evaluation of FSOT patency and subjective symptoms
symptoms or need for revision
– 6- to 75- month evaluation of FS patency and symptom improvement/worsening
–8- to 48- month follow-up of FS patency or revision requirement
functionality and need to remove
–10- to 36- month endoscopic
–1- to 47- month presence of
–12- to 45- month stent
sinus silicone stents x 1-4 weeks
–12 patients (21 FS stents: 7 rains, 7 U-stents, 4 H-stents) x 6 months
stents with rolled silicone x up to 8 weeks all after
external Lynch approach
Banhiran 2227 2006 4 Case-cohort –72 EMLP patients with 25 silastic stents x 2 months
–102 silicone FS stents x 6-130 days (avg 35)
semi-rigid stent, duration not specified
–6 patients with frontal
–196 fronto-nasal duct
–73 frontal sinus silicone
Perloff 2232 2004 4 Descriptive case series
Amble 2223 1996 4 Descriptive case series
Weber 22 2000 4 Descriptive case series
Rains 2226 2001 4 Descriptive case series
Freeman 2224 2000 4 Descriptive case series
TABLE XII-23 (Continued)
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online