xRead - Nasal Obstruction (September 2024) Full Articles

20426984, 0, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alr.23262, Wiley Online Library on [02/01/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License

153

ICAR SINONASAL TUMORS

TABLE XVI.8 (Continued)

Clinical endpoints

Study

Year LOE Study design Study groups

Conclusion

Healy et al. 410

Drilling, cauterizing, or completely excising the bone underlying the tumor base during endoscopic resection reduced the recurrence rate of inverted and oncocytic papilloma when compared to mucosal stripping alone (4.9% [3/61] vs. 4.7% [1/21] vs. 0.0% [0/22] vs. 52.2% [12/23], p = 0.001) Radical removal with emphasis on bony resection may be key to prevent recurrence of IP Smoking (28.2% [11/39] vs. 10.8% [10/93], p = 0.012) and tumor with extranasal/sinus extension (OR = 15.2, p = 0.049) appear to be associated with increased rates of IP recurrence after surgical resection achieved low recurrence rates compared to open approaches (14.3% [6/42] vs. 66.7% [6/9]) 2. Close long-term follow-up is warranted for early detection and to allow for surgical salvage (mean time to recurrence 41months) Recurrences occurred an average of 23 months after surgery, emphasizing need for long-term endoscopic follow-up to detect recurrence (15% [17/114]) Midface degloving can result in excellent access for resection with durable cure rates (2.1% [2/98] recurrence) without scar of lateral rhinotomy incision Suggested role for HPV in the pathogenesis of sinonasal papilloma but no correlation seen 1. The endoscopic approach

1. Recurrence 2. Time to recurrence

2016 4

Retrospective case series

Patients undergoing EEA for IP or

oncocytic papilloma ( n = 127)

Ungari et al. 735

2015 4

Retrospective case series

Patients with IP undergoing

Recurrence

resection via open, endoscopic, or combined approaches ( n = 35) underwent resection via endoscopic, open, or combined approaches for IP ( n = 132)

Moonet al. 731

Recurrence

2010 4

Retrospective case series

Patients who

Díaz-Molina et al. 736

2009 4

Retrospective case series

Patients undergoing

1. Recurrence 2. Time to recurrence

endoscopic, open, or combined resection for IP ( n = 61)

Woodworth et al. 721

1. Recurrence 2. Time to recurrence

2007 4

Retrospective case series

Patients undergoing endoscopic or

endoscopic-assisted open resection for IP ( n = 114)

Pengand

2006 4

Retrospective case series

Patients with IP resected via

Recurrence

Har-El 727

midfacial degloving andmedial maxillectomy ( n = 98) Patients with sinonasal papillomas ( n = 43; n = 34with IP)

Kraft et al. 718

Recurrence

2001 4

Retrospective case series

between HPV and rates of recurrence or malignancy Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; EEA, endoscopic endonasal approach; IP, inverted papilloma; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.