xRead - Olfactory Disorders (September 2023)

20426984, 2022, 4, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alr.22929, Wiley Online Library on [04/09/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License

509

PATEL et al.

TABLE VIII.7 (Continued)

Normative data available

No. of odorsor items

Commercially available

Reliability coefficient

Test name and author/s

Comments Reports Pearson correlation withUPSIT R of 0.98, but this is misleading since half of the patients were anosmic with Kallmann syndrome and half had high UPSIT R scores (median, 37; mean, 36.8; mode, 36) Employs commercially available colored children’s odorized markers to dispense stimuli in a similar manner to that of the Alberta Smell Test 1138 although different odorants Sum of points are assigned to initial “spontaneous naming” and then to a 4-alternative forced-choice ID task Distinguishes anosmics from normosmics with high sensitivity and specificity Requires blindfolding Single ascending method of limits threshold test using n-butanol Normal scores < 3dilution number for patients up to 50 years of age (n = 54) and < 4 for those older than this age (n = 46) Validated by determining the sensitivity and specificity of differentiating persons with nasal polyposis from those without nasal polyposis A match-to-sample recognition test employing 16 target odors and various combinations of 16 foil odors using SS pens Found to be sensitive to age but not sex Similar to Odor Memory/ Discrimination Test (Choudhury et al 1165 ) except microencapsulated odorants not used Based on extensive research of odorant mixture discriminations to optimize reliability relative to test length and psychophysical procedures are used

Test type

Odorized Marker Screening Test Vodicka et al, 2007 1137

ID

5

NR

No

No

Connecticut Smell Test (CST) Toledano et al, 2009 1139

DT

1

NR

No

No

Short-term Odor Recognition Memory Test Zucco, 2011 1171

ID

16

0.90

No

No

Dusseldort Odor Discrimination Test Weierstall and Pause, 2012 1172

DISC

15

0.66

No

No

(Continues)