xRead - Olfactory Disorders (September 2023)
20426984, 2022, 4, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alr.22929, Wiley Online Library on [04/09/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
523
PATEL et al.
TABLE VIII.9 (Continued)
Normative data available
Reliability coeffi cent
Commercially available Comments
Estimated test duration
Test name and author/s
No. of odors or items
Testtype
No differences between 3 child age groups No sex effects Uses hard sweet candies of unknown manufacturers to assess retronasal OF in children andadults Scores correlate well with orthonasal smell tests In 230 children and 123 adults, score of ≤ 13 differentiated anosmics from normosmics with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 83% Extensive developmental research to obtain 6 odorants familiar to children and could distinguish between those with normal smell or dyfunction in a low-cost, brief, and easy-to-administer test 1446 children were studied to provide normative data that were validated against the UPSIT R andB-SIT Odorants are presented on a cardboard disk that rotates within an outer jacket, such that only one scratch & sniff odorant at a time is exposed for sampling Pictures and words employed in game-like format Can be self-administered Validated in 152 children and adults No normative data but scores < 5 suggestive of anosmia Six odorants chosen from a test of 21 odorants given to 37 children aged < 5 years, 30 aged 5 to7 years, and 18 aged 7 to10 years Odors presented in bottles Scoreof ≥ 4 considered normal, being achieved by 96.5% of the 85 children Odorants selected to be identified by children (mean [SD] age, 6.3 years [0.5 years]) Collaboration among 18 countries Employs SS pens to present stimuli Forced-choice 4-response alternatives with pictures for each test item Dysfunction based on 10th percentile, which differed among some countries (Continues)
Candy Smell Test Renner et al, 2009 1217
ID
23
0.75
≈ 20minutes
Limited
No
NIH Toolbox Children’s Test Dalton et al, 2011 1226
ID
6
< 7minutes
Limited
Yes
Pediatric Smell Wheel (PSW) Cameron and Doty, 2013 1227
ID
11
0.70
< 5minutes
Limited
Yes
Test for
ID
6
NR
< 5minutes
Limited
No
Screening Olfactory Function in Children Dzaman et al, 2013 1228 Universal Sniff (U-Sniff) Test Schriever et al, 2018 1229
ID
12
0.83
< 10minutes
Yes
No
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker