xRead - Olfactory Disorders (September 2023)
20426984, 2022, 4, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alr.22929, Wiley Online Library on [04/09/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
528
INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS ON OLFACTION
TABLE VIII.10 Correlations among extant psychophysical olfactory tests
Age,mean (SDor range), year
No. of patients (male/female)
Correlation coefficients
Study groups Healthy patients
Correlated tests
P value
Study author
Doty et al, 1984 13 42.4 (18.9)
64
UPSIT R vs threshold (PEA) UPSIT R vs threshold (PEA)
0.89
0.001
Healthy minus anosmic patients
0.79
0.001
77 (70–90)
NR
Healthy patients
ID vs threshold
0.51
0.02
Stevens and
Cain, 1987 1232
(isoamyl butyrate)
ID vs threshold
0.56
0.006
(benzaldehyde)
ID vs threshold (d-limonene) ID vs threshold
0.63
0.003
21.0 (18–24) NR
Healthy patients
0.30
NS
(isoamyl butyrate)
ID vs threshold
0.21
NS
(benzaldehyde)
ID vs threshold (d-limonene) ID versusvsvs
0.16
NS
0.77
0.001
47.2 (6–85)
670 (NR)
Mixed and S&T clinic patients
Cainet al, 1988 1233
Threshold threshold (n-butanol) UPSIT R vs butanol threshold (2 sessions with different patients; 4 and 5 trial correct response criterion for thresholds of each session) UPSIT R vsCCCRCID test Butanol threshold vs CCCRC ID test Pyridine threshold vs butanol threshold Pyridine threshold v isoamyl butyrate threshold Pyridine threshold vs PEMEC threshold
Cain and Rabin, 1989 1234
1: 46.5 (9–75) 2: 44.6 (18–33)
24/26 22/36
S&T clinic patients
0.92–0.96
0.001
0.95–0.96
0.001
0.73–0.90
0.001
Cain and Gent, 1991 1202
37.3 (NR)
10/22
Healthy patients
0.74
0.001
0.86
0.001
0.69
0.001
Isoamyl butyrate
0.86
0.001
threshold vs PEMEC threshold
0.71
0.001
Isoamyl butyrate
threshold vs butanol threshold
Butanol threshold vs PEMEC threshold
0.66
0.001
(Continues)
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker