xRead - Olfactory Disorders (September 2023)
20426984, 2022, 4, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alr.22929, Wiley Online Library on [04/09/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
594
INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS ON OLFACTION
TABLE IX-29 Use of OT to treat OD Study Year
LOE Study design
Study groups
Clinical end point
Conclusions
SS-TDI
All studies reported clinically significant results after OT OT had an odds ratio of
Kattar
2020
1
Systematic review and meta-analysis
OT forPIOD 16 studies included 4 in meta-analysis
et al 250
2.77 of achieving MCID vs control Strong significant
Sorokowska et al 1484
2017
1
Systematic review and meta-analysis
13 studies
SS-TDI
relationship with OT and discrimination and identification, and overall TDI score improvement PIOD has the strongest relationship with improvement OT improves TDI (3.77, mean difference) Discrimination and identification improved, but not threshold Odds ratio of MCID 2.75 OT was effective in all 10 identified studies
Pekala
2016
1
Systematic review and meta-analysis
10 studies 3 for meta-analysis
Olfactory
et al 1543
improvement using psychophysical tests
Hura
2020
1
Systematic review (EBRR) for PIOD
10 studies for OT Effectiveness of OT, medical therapy
et al 374
Addison and Philpott 1552
2018
1
Systematic review 1 meta-analysis, 6 studies
Effectiveness of OT, medical therapy
OT is effective for
improving olfaction in olfactory loss
Langdon et al 1066
2018
2
Prospective, RCT
42 patients with PTOD OT with 6 odors for 12weeks (n = 21) Controls (n = 21)
UPSIT R BAST-24 n-butanol threshold VAS
No significant difference in
UPSIT R , BAST-24, VAS 26% vs 5% met MCID for n-butanol
threshold at 12 weeks, but not sustained at 24 weeks
Patel
UPSIT R
2017
2
Prospective, RCT
43 patients with PIOD or IOD for > 12months OT with 4 essential oils for 26 weeks (n = 19) Controls (n = 16) 171 patients with PIOD for 2 to 24 months High concentration COT(n = 70) Low concentration COT(n = 74) Crossover at 16 weeks
32% in OT group (vs 13% in control group) had > 10% improvement on UPSIT R TDI improved by 3.0 in thehigh concentration group vs 2.8 in the low concentration group at 16weeks 26% vs 15% met MCID 53% vs 34% subjective improvement at 32 weeks
et al 1544
Damm
2014
2
Prospective, blinded randomized controlled multicenter
SS-TDI 5-point subjective ranking scale
et al 1541
(Continues)
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker