xRead - Olfactory Disorders (September 2023)
20426984, 2022, 4, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alr.22929, Wiley Online Library on [04/09/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
406
INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS ON OLFACTION
TABLE VII.12 (Continued)
Study design Study groups
Clinical end point B-threshold
Topic
Study
Year LOE
Conclusions
Baconet al 570
1998 4
Case
8 AD converters 62 stable HCs
Threshold changed in year before AD conversion. MCI carriers of ApoE ε 4 had poorer thresholds than noncarriers UPSIT R abnormal in all 8 AD patients; OERP normal in the 4 patients that could be tested AD was differentiated from depression 1 or 0 correct on the 3-item test discriminated with a hit rate of 90% (80% sensitivity; 100% specificity) AD performed worse on odor threshold; OM, as reflected by ability to generate odor names to cued odors or names of odors, lower in AD No significant B-threshold differences; AD performed more poorly on odor ID composite, with poorer performance on odor matching test Poorer threshold scores in AD Remote memory for odors, measured by familiarity test 1 year later, more impaired in AD than remote memory for some visual stimuli Test discriminated between AD and depression with a hit rate of 97.5% (95% sensitivity; 100% specificity) ADscores = VD scores; all lower than those of HCs UPSIT R correlated 0.68 with the degree of cognitive impairment measured by CAMCOG UPSIT R but not PEA threshold impaired in AD Odors activated left and right piriform areas and right anterior ventral temporal cortex (Continues)
control
Hawkes and
1998 4
Case
8AD 156HCs
UPSIT R OERP
Shephard 571
control
Solomon 572
1998 4
Case
20AD 20MD
PST
control
Bacon-Moore et al 573
1999 4
Case
40AD 40 matched HCs
B-threshold Odor ID Odor fluency
control
Larsson 574
1999 4
Case
11AD 11HCs
B-threshold ID: free ID, verbal cues, visual
control
cues, odor matching
Niccoli-Waller et al 575
1999 4
Case
32AD 32HCs
B-threshold 10-odor
control with longitu dinal prospec tive arm
longitudinal familiarity memory test
McCaffrey et al 576
2000 4
Case
20AD 20MD
PST
control
Grayet al 577
2001 4
Case
13AD 13VD 13HCs
UPSIT R
control
Kareken et al 578
7AD 8HCs
UPSIT R PEA threshold PET imaging
2001 4
Case
control andPET imaging
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker